Thursday, May 21, 2009

Noise - power and pressure, refrigerators and turbines

Like many of you, I've read every test report from sound consultants that comes my way.

Unless you are an engineer, it's easy to get lost in the technical details and lose the important points. Even the typical report does a few dances. Here's where:

The report will in most cases, reference the turbine manufacturer's specifications, "104db" sound power level. In the very next sentence they will state this is not at all important or related to sound pressure levels.

Why is this important? Sound power levels is the sound measured at the source without the enivronment. So, it is irrefutable that wind turbines make 100-107db of sound at the source. It's fact, not ficton, not opinion, not a developer's belief. Fact, supplied by the turbine manufacturer.

What the reports then describe the prediction of how the environment will reduce that sound power --- into what you will actually hear (the sound pressure).

Power is output (what is broadcast) --- pressure is input (what you receive/hear).

The point is we aren't starting at a kitchen refrigerator - we are starting at a rock concert. What the environment (distance, terrain, atmosphere, folage, etc) does with that very loud noise may end up as a kitchen refrigerator, or it may not (and does not in serveral documented cases).

How do we permit a Rock Concert at a town? Does a code officer work off of the noise generated or the noise received? Why aren't there prescribed fines in wind turbine laws when the rock concert level noise disturbs a resident to consider it a nusiance (or worse)?

This industry is crying out to be regulated.

Thursday, April 09, 2009

AWEA: Wind farms are fairly quiet

The AWEA, the green wrecking ball of progres, is a true poster child for more industry regulation. Here it takes on ABC news with the predictible spin about noise:


"Gibson, probably without intending to, called attention to an issue that the wind industry has
addressed in international, peer-reviewed studies as well as anecdotal surveys in communities with operating wind farms. Thousands of wind turbines have been installed around the world, many in close proximity to other types of land use, with minimal sound issues. This is due in large part to the wind industry’s commitment to being a good neighbor and addressing public concerns regarding wind turbines and sound in an open, proactive way. In fact, properly sited wind farms benefit communities as a local and renewable energy source and any sound concerns can usually be resolved to the satisfaction of the stakeholders involved."

"Wind plants are always located where the wind speed is higher than
average, and the "background" sound of the wind tends to "mask" any sounds that might be produced by operating wind turbines - especially because the turbines only run when the wind is blowing. In general, wind farms are fairly quiet."

As the AWEA gains more and more power in the US, it needs to be forced from it's current "let them eat cake" attitude, defending all negativity to the point of fraud --- to becoming a responsible organization that is constrained by regulation. The green wrecking ball of progress that it is today just isn't good for America's rural environment.

This is no longer a few 'cool' wind parks here and there. This is an industry by it's wreckless no-impact positions, begging for national environmental, siting and zoning regulations. The AWEA is truly running out of control with it's unchecked marketing spin. Most of the problems we are experiencing with the recent installations in New York, Maine, Wisconsin are the result of the AWEA's failure to be honest with itself and the public.

Until the AWEA addresses in a realistic manner, or are forced to by regulation --- every industrialization will be starting with the position that wind turbines make no noise, are masked by the wind and are no louder than kitchen refrigerators.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

LaBella and Associates: Certifying industrial impacts to rural residents

Who is responsible at LaBella associates for making the determination that turbine noise would not be a nusiance/problem and further that larger turbines would make no difference in Cohocton (as quoted by Jim Sherron SCIDA).

What specifically is LaBella going to do to fix this problem?

We have these _engineers_ to thank for "consulting" with our IDA and town board that there would be no impacts worth serious consideration?

What _data_ did LaBella use? Did they go to Wisconsin and talk with those that filed noise complaints? Did they take _any_ of this into consideration or just use the AWEA marketing hype as gospel data? Did they simply use the very flawed modeling software? Or did they consult with acoustic engineers?

LaBella has alot to answer for and their professional reputation is on the line.

Turbine Noise: Not just Cohocton New York

Don't think noise complaints are unique to Cohocton New York.

From East to West coast noise complaints exist. Europe complaints have been around for years. Lincoln installation complaints were brought forward but dismissed, ironically using the same excuse told about noise in Cohocton "the model of turbines is different".

Does this explaination work both ways? First, by the town boards and developer to sell the turbines and dismiss concerns about noise --- and now by the town boards and developer to explain why there is noise. How ironic.

Wisconsin site: http://betterplan.squarespace.com/

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

AWOL: Where is Wayne Hunt and the planning board now?

Why isn't the Cohocton Board being called on to answer for themselves? They had all the answers - those that asked for caution were laughed at. Those that brought information from other installations were ignored.

So now with a mess on their hands, what do we get in the Corning Leader?

"Local officials said they have relied on the best information available and worked to ensure the safety of residents."

Safety? Was that really the only objective? What about quality of life?

Is this even remotely true? They did everything possible to ignore, trash, invalidate, any negative information that was presented to them. Mars Hill? Ignored. Lincoln? Invalidated. Tug Hill? Ignored. Europe? Ignored. In fact, Town Board members went out of their way to write long public letters in the newspaper (Valley News) about how "nutty" anyone who said they were noisy or had negative impacts. Town meeting after town meeting. Week after week, month after month.

And now how are they working to clean up the mess they created? The supervisor writes an open letter to the media that he's not going to handle complaints.

These people had no business siting an industrial park on top of residences -

Monday, March 30, 2009

AWEA: Wind Turbines Can Be Heard

25 Feb 2009 11:33:22 pm
More Notes from AWEA’s Siting Workshop—Day Two


SEATTLE--(partial article)

Thousands of people live near wind farms without complaints. But some residents have complained, and since sound is often regulated at a local level, community acceptance is essential before a wind farm is developed. Panelist Mark Bastasch, of CH2M Hill, noted that the industry has to “provide clarity once and for all” on the sound question. That means, among other things, assembling an advisory panel to determine whether more research is needed. He also stated that developers should make sure that the community understands beforehand that “turbines can be heard.”

One of the final speakers, Robert Kahn, of Robert D. Kahn & Co., noted that he doesn’t “do” Power Point presentations, then proceeded to deliver perfect verbal bullet points on getting wind projects approved:
--You have to get the science right. He who has the best data wins.
--You have to send in lawyers and (hired) guns and money.--You must reach accommodation with the (government) agencies. And you need to be prepared to mitigate where appropriate.
--If you get those steps right, your chances for success are vastly improved.

Prattsburgh: Under Siege

After reading newspaper quotes and the notes from the March 24th meetings.

Members of the board should be the next investigation for wind ethics violations.

What specifically is it that is driving to throw caution to the wind and ram an industrial park down people's backs regardless of any facts?

- A promised job?
- Relatives or "best friends" are leaseholders?
- Bonus payments after the project is in?
- Listens to Ecogen over own residents?
- Truely believes that Cohocton is unique and the only place that noise has been a problem with industrial wind projects?

Monday, March 09, 2009

Prattsburgh: Time to hire a new attorney

Who is this Leyden and is he representing the town of Prattsburgh or Ecogen?

Prattsburgh get a new town attorney as soon as possible, this one has forgotten his fudiciary responsibility to his client!


"His suggestion was followed by a reminder from John Leyden, Prattsburgh’s town attorney, that EcoGen had notified town officials it had to have a permit or a permit waiver immediately following Tuesday’s board meeting.

“They said ‘we want it now or we’re suing,’” he said.

The lawsuit would be based on the company’s claim that the town board has no legal right to delay the project.

Leyden said EcoGen has already submitted an application to the board, and maintains a permit is not really required for the project. The company says the project’s financing depends on a swift decision by the board, according to Leyden.

However, EcoGen’s application was turned down by the Prattsburgh board in December, followed by a resolution early this year saying they would not issue a permit until the law was in place, according to Councilman Steve Kula.

Leyden said the lawsuit from the developer would be difficult to defend, but added the town did have arguments in its favor.

“I’m for whatever you want to do,” he said. “I just want you to know what you’re facing.”"

First Wind Cohocton - moderately quiet room

Even as of today March 9, 2009 below is what the First Wind website states about noise - wonder if they even read the complaint letters or listened to the phone calls?

"Frequently Asked Questions
Below are some basic answers to frequently asked questions and concerns about wind energy. If you have any additional questions about wind energy or the Cohocton Wind project, please visit the resources section or contact us.

Q: What sounds do wind turbines make?A: Today, an operating wind energy project at a distance of 750 to 1,000 feet emits sounds at a level comparable to a kitchen refrigerator or a moderately quiet room. Wind turbines make a whooshing sound as the blades travel through the air. When standing directly under a wind turbine, you may hear a hum made by the generator and/or gearbox. Because wind turbines only produce sound when appropriate wind conditions are experienced, the wind makes sound as well, and the sound of an operating wind turbine is masked more than 800-900 feet away. Thus, with appropriate setbacks enacted through local regulatory authorities, wind turbine sound emissions should not affect neighboring residents. "

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Public Letter by Wayne Hunt June 13, 2006

I opened my Valley News on June 13, 2006 to read this. Emphasis mine.

Reflections concerning the “Cohocton Wind Watch” advocates.
I have attended several anti wind power presentations in the
past year. They have all been fairly repetitious dog and pony shows
that raise dramatic doomsday scenarios. Each point needs to be
examined carefully to find the real truth that might be in it
.
A most fascinating hypothesis that came out of one of the
Cohocton presentation was the one about reinforced resounding
noise from windmills. This theory suggest that the noise from a
windmill seems bearable right underneath it but some how resonates
and compounds itself every 1/10 of a mile from the tower for up to
mile away. This mythical scenario creates a most significant health
hazard. And, oh yes, magically the effect is worse when the windmills
are on top of hills where the noise, can tumble downward onto
all of us unsuspecting victims. What a whimsical theory???
We have all heard the negative fallacy’s the CWW (Cohocton
Wind Watch) have been saying
, but how many of them have even
visited a working wind farm? Have they personally, randomly
stopped at homes that have and don’t have windmills to talk to the
residents to hear what they have to say about the turbines?
Obviously none of them have or they would know for a fact that
there is very little noise, even when you stand directly under the
turbines,
animals and birds are not affected. There has been NO
insurance claim regarding ice throw and the value of the land has not
depreciated. In fact the opposite is true, an article in the Standard
Post, Syracuse, N. Y. dated May 27, 2006, stated that the property
values have increased in Fenner.

Wind watchers make a strong point about town councilmen who
seem to be in favor of the windmills for the money only. That is not
true. Your town board recognizes the importance of wind power as
a future source of electricity. Wind power will not solve our electricity
shortages but by itself, but will certainly contribute 5%+ to our supply
currently
and certainly more than that as technology advances.
If Cohocton, with our wind resources, was offered no compensation
for windmills, we should go ?head with the program to fulfill
our obligation to contribute to the stewardship of our land, our air and
our standard of living.
People of Cohocton, put your faith in your planning board, the
town board and most of all put your faith in the families that have
lived on the land and worked the soil for generations
Do you really
think they would do anything to hurt the town of Cohocton or the
surrounding area?
The decision to place windmills on their farms
was not an easy decision. These landowners have done their homework
researching the wind turbine farms before committing to the
project. What the lease landowners have actually done is provide
something of worth to all the residents of the town.
They may hold a
lease for the turbines but all of us will benefit from the PILOT funds
paid by the developer.
YES! Wind Power for Cohocton
Wayne Hunt
Published on June 13, 2006 on Page 8 in THE VALLEY NEWS

Public Letter by Hal Graham June 13, 2006

Here is what I opened my Valley News to on June 13, 2006. Emphasis mine.

My wife and I are landowners on Lent Hill with a windmill slated for
our farm. With all the negative information put out by the Cohocton Wind
Watch (CWW), we thought maybe we had missed something, how could we
have done that, could we have made a bad judgment
. Did we overlook
something in our pre-investigation into windmills and on our trip to Fenner?
We decided to go to Tug Hill and talk to the locals. We randomly
stopped at houses and spoke with owners and non-owners of windmills. We
spoke to people in the local restaurant and to one employee.
The first thing we wanted to check out was the noise claim. We
checked out the claim by the Cohocton Wind Watch that the generators
would be equivalent to a 747 plane on top of each windmill. This is an
absolute and preposterous fabrication by the anti-wind group
. We drove our
car up to the base of several windmills and had to cut the car off in order to
hear any noise. We did hear a very slight whoosh and a very low noise from
the generator. We cut the car off at 300 ft, 500 ft and 700 ft to hear what
noise the generators make. 300 feet a small noise, 500 feet a very faint noise
and 700 feet nothing. No roar of a 747 as the anti-wind advocates claim. No
tumbling noise.
One local landowner had no windmills on his land but said he loved
them. His pond was clear and he had Geese on it. There had been no dear
kill and wildlife was all around. He viewed them as pleasing and calming. The
greatest thing that has happen for the Town.
Another landowner, a dairy farmer said his cows had no trouble with
the windmills and never have had a nosebleed as the group would have you
believe. He would have to stop and listen to see if the windmills were making
a noise. He was going to put his revenue back into his farm to keep him in
operation for many years.
We asked about:
Ice throw none
Bird/wildlifekill none
Water pollution none
Pond stagnant none
All these with the others are false claims just to meet the agenda of
CWW.

As far as the set back and locations we must say that our Planning
Board has done one superior job with their requirements. The anti group has
gone from a set back of 1,500 feet, then to 1 mile, then 2 miles and now 5
miles. What next??
We also checked Out the fabricated untruths that property values
would drop like a rock.
The property values in Fenner have had a significant increase in value,
not a drop.
In summary, Judy and I did not miss anything, what we did realize was
that the Town
Fathers and the Town Planning Board have made the best plans
available for Cohocton, and that the Cohocton Wind Watch has fabricated
all the wildest scenarios to meet their own agenda.
Hal & Judy Stanton Graham
Published on June 13, 2006 on Page 9 in THE VALLEY NEWS

Monday, February 23, 2009

Wayne Hunt Part 2

Hunt suggested that the town find a way to change the law to a more reasonable decibel level.

Hunt’s father, town board member Wayne Hunt, said, “Changing the law is not going to change the sound.”

How practical of you Wayne.

Repeatedly 2004-2008, you told us this was all internet fantasy. You wrote article after article in the newspaper about how "nutty" we all were that protested and warned about noise and other problems.

Now, the ever "scientific" Wayne Hunt arrives here in 2009: "Changing the law is not going to change the sound."

Unbelievable!

Hal Graham Part 2

Is this the same Hal Graham that chided all who opposed the industrial wind project openly at meetings and in writing in the newspaper? The same Hal Graham that called those who opposed (due to noise and other problems) nasty vulgar names?

The same Hal Graham?

"And now I can't sleep at night" - he says acting the victim.

Pity poor Hal Graham, who freely signed the lease - committing this act with full INTENT and full KNOWLEDGE of the potential problems. What about his neighbor with no say who is truly the victim?

No Hal Graham, no lease, no lease, no wind farm. It's that simple for every leaseholder.

This is a Judge who is running around exclaiming "They made me do it?" Unbeleivable.

Shame on you Hal Graham.

Anonymous Caller

This guy is a hoot. The caller seemed real, but who knows. If he is truly a leaseholder, he shows to be a most irresponsible person. I wouldn't trust him with my lunch money - he'd lose it and blame someone else.

"They [First Wind] mislead us". Is he serious?

"The red light district of Cohocton". What did he think was going to look like with 50 strobe lights in a hilly country setting?

"I would have never done this to my friends and neighbors". You DID, You DID!

Is there something in the water that makes some people in Cohocton so dumb?

If you listen to this (and if it's real) --- it's so #@*! retarded it's beyond anything I've ever heard in my life.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Paul Wolcott: "It's Been a Team Effort"

"It's been a team effort. It hasn't been push and shove. Everything we've done, we've done on our own free will," Paul Wolcott about the AG's investigation. This is like asking the fox who stole the chickens.

Just who's team is Wolcott talking about? The team of YES, Wolcott, UPC and The Town Board?

What seems to fly right over Wolcott's head is that the investigation isn't questioning if *he*'s been treated fairly. It's public knowledge that he was in favor of this project and anything the government did to get it through was okay with him. He gets his check and those towers of his on his land are just "emotional" for some of his neighbors.

No this investigation isn't about Wolcott's satisfaction with UPC at all --- the government had a responsibility to follow Ethics law and be on the same team with all the people, even Wolcott's neighbors.

Unfortunately, anyone who followed this knows that UPC and YES and the TOWN BOARD and Wolcott, et al were in bed together. It's not hard to triangulate Ethics violations when Councilman Wayne Hunt writes strong pro-UPC letters published in the newspaper signing his name YESWINDCOHOCTON on one hand and wears a YES green hat around, and then on the other YES being strongly tied to UPC.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg...

Monday, June 16, 2008

Oranges and Pineapples

Watch the very impressive Chris Swartley and Brian Cocca Firstwind team on answering how much electricity will go to the grid from the Prattsburg project.



Does anyone else get the impression that they don't know and more importantly don't even understand why this is important? Could it be that actually producing power is the _last_ thing on thier minds. It's all about renewable credits and tax breaks, producing power is an afterthought.

Talk about used car salesmen. "You want it yellow --- we'll paint it yellow!" "What number do you want us to say? - we'll say it --- anything to get you to approve the project"

Integrity

For months we the townspeople of Cohocton were assaulted with numerous "citizen" letters from the YESWINDCOHOCTON folks. These letters were filled with doing what was best for our town, and speaking as private citizens of Cohocton. The blogs and Valley news were full of articles from these "citizens". The UPC project was best for our town we were told over and over.

Those who opposed were by default not good citizens and the opposers were engaged in deceptive methods with hidden agendas. These messages frequently smacked of rightious indignation --- absolute moral authority.

How bizarre we find once the project is approved those with the loudest voices of promotion suddenly signing thier names as employees of UPC/Firstwind!!!!

How does Cohocton's finest now UPC/Firstwind employees look themselves in the mirror?

The hyposricy and complete lack of integrity is as astounding as the project itself.

Formosa

Friday, June 13, 2008

John Roberts on Eminent Domain

Wayne Hunt and the Prattsburg board needs to listen to Robert's answer on Eminent Domain.

"Legislative bodies in the states are protectors of the people's rights" "You can protect them where the court has determined that they [the court] are not going to draw that line"

Calder v. Bull - "The government may not take the property from A and give it to B"

Thursday, June 12, 2008

WAYNE HUNT: "They tell me"

Wayne Hunt went in front of the Prattsburg meeting and said "They tell me that if we allow wind development to continue - by 2030 it will generate the same electricity as nuclear". In fact Wayne tells us it's from an article from a local newspaper.

Who is "they" that Wayne listens to? Wind developers? Local newspapers? Mr. Hunt may not be aware that after 20 years of development worldwide, not a single conventional power plant has been replaced. Not one. The Department of Energy doesn't share Mr. Hunt's forecast, they predict only 2% by 2030.

The question we all should be asking Mr. Hunt is simple. Where did he get his Industrial Management degree? Is he an IEE perhaps? How many years has Mr. Hunt managed electrical power generation or worked in the utility industry? What industrial or public utility boards has Mr. Hunt served on since 1999? How many large industrial projects has Mr. Hunt planned, managed or supervised? What's Mr. Hunt's actual experience with Eminent Domain law he's so in favor of?

The plain truth is by his naive statements - Mr. Hunt's knowledge must be limited to what wind developers have told him. His entire spin seems coupled to the wind industry. But to stand up and promote himself as a public utility expert to the people of Prattsburg shows a tragic misunderstanding of Wind's boom and bust history and these developers very short sided goals which end up damaging our homes and neighborhoods.

Formosa

Friday, December 07, 2007

NOT INDUSTRIAL!



"They aren't Industrial" - Paul Wolcott, Cohocton Planning Board Meeting.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Unable to Sell: What say you Ben Hoen?

(What say you Ben Hoen??? - ed)


If you think you may someday want to sell your Catskills home if retirement or other career or family matters require you to relocate, you should read here what is happening to one such homeowner.

As a Delaware County Realtor with extensive experience in our region, I’ve had to watch as a wonderful senior-citizen couple in the town of Stamford have had three potential sales of their lovely farmhouse and 30 acres collapse for the sole reason that industrial wind turbines could be within view of their property.

The couple is relocating to Maryland to be closer to their family but have been unable to sell their long-time home even though buyers had agreed to the price. When the buyers learned about the planned industrial turbines in the vicinity, all three canceled their offers.

When you go to vote for your town representatives you should find out which ones are opposing the turbine projects and vote for them because if the turbines are approved, they will seriously compromise your property values if you can make a sale at all. That is not hypothetical. It comes from real, current experience _ and one I’ve directly lost money from.

But the owners are in even worse shape for not being able to sell at all.

Reginald Oberlag

Hobart

Friday, November 09, 2007

Spaghetti against the refrigerator

Questions to ask about wind farms January 2, 2007 in Bloomington Pantagraph


Allowing wind companies free range because of the “We-have-to-do-something!'’ attitude, is like throwing spaghetti against the refrigerator, hoping it sticks and worrying about the mess later. Ignoring and minimizing genuine concerns of the affected residents and neighbors is dangerous, too. The scars of a divided community will last far longer than any turbine and the lease payments. Only those who’ve experienced small town/rural living can fully appreciate the value of a united, harmonious community. Blindly sacrificing that is not a price any of us should be willing to accept.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Ben Hoen: City Boy's Bill of Goods

Here's the guy who's flawed college paper is being flaunted that Wind Turbines do not impact property values. Where does he live? In rural America? Not on your life, New York City!!

Just remember the facts of Hoen's paper - no property was analyzed within 3/4 mile and the average property was 3.5 miles from the nearest turbine. No value placed on viewshed. This was clearly a statistically "watered down" analysis by any measure.

"Ben Hoen (class of 2006) has been hired by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to study the potential effects that wind energy facilities have on surrounding property values. He will analyze the selling prices of homes surrounding 6-8 existing wind facilities around the country using techniques very similar to those used in his master's thesis. He lives in Brooklyn, NY with his wife and two kids."

You might ask, what did college student Hoen do prior to becoming the nation's sole authority on Wind Turbine impacts on property values? What qualifications did he bring with him to the study - what real world experience? Was he in real estate? Financial background? Scientific analysis background? Commerical property? Work with large scale utility projects? Did he run an apprasal company?

Nope, he ran a resturant in Brooklyn NY!!!

http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/24/34/24_34dizzys.html

Amazing.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

ECO THIEF

One views the construction in Cohocton - the hardhats, the construction crews and trucks driving 40-50 mph at 6am on once quiet dirt roads. The machinery, the concrete, the grading, the UPC chump pointing to a metal ring with some "aw shucks, isn't this cool" rethoric for the newspaper (can anyone say "well cooked ham?")

One views all this with awe like being in the Twilight Zone. Awe that anyone with double digit IQ actually stood up in front of a crowd and said these things aren't industrial. Awe that anyone justifies this construction with a "now we can work and live here" pretzel logic. (thankfully they don't allow this to happen outside of NYS - or these same people would dig up our beaches and put in factories so they can live and work in the same place) Awe at how easy it was for these folks to rationalize doing this to Cohocton's sleepy rural environment was a "good" thing - a slam dunk we were all told.

Throughout history there are those that have taken advantage of a situation, at the expense of others. After the civil war, the carpet baggers. After recent hurricanes, selling water for punishing prices to thirsty storm victims. Now we have a new breed of opportunitist: The ECO Thief.

Playing on the issue of the day, climate change --- Carbon neutral, pay some money and the ECO Thief sends you a piece of paper that says you are a better citizen. Playing on the guilt of modern living. Sign a lease when there was no law or zoning to do this, and then tell your neighbors to shove it, your rights trump all of theirs. The arrogance is mindboggling.

Sleepy town, nothing growing but grass and trees? Let a developer come in and industrialize the area, all in the name of "green" energy. Concrete, steel, industrial construction, industrialize the ridgeline? No problem! It's good for you. It's not industrial, it's "green". The ECO Thief tells you are a better citizen for it. He'll pay you some money to boot, it's a new crop (really?)

ECO Thieves = Modern day carpet baggers.

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Conard: Inequitable Increase in Taxes for some Cohocton Property Owners

"When you get your Cohocton School bill this month, the increase in assessment will illustrate that the Zigenfus administration has systematically and arbitrarily raised the property value of owners that need to be punished. If your tax mailing address is out of Cohocton, or if you moved into this town, you qualify for that other infamous message. “If you don’t like the way Cohocton is run – “GET OUT OF TOWN’ ”. The penalty for being a non participating landowner is to have the assessors jack up your assessment. Your reward is to shell out more than your reasonable part, while favored families avoid paying their fair share. Is that evenhanded to Cohocton village or Atlanta hamlet residents?

The housing market has crashed. Prices are headed down and properties are losing value. But the incumbent assessors approved a hefty increase upon indifferent property owners or select troublemakers. Just wait till the actual dollar rates jump in order to pay for the mismanagement of Cohocton government."

--- Rebecca Conard, candidate for Cohocton Town Assessor

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Defending the Wind Hypocrisy

"It is interesting to note that the primary objection
that environmentalists have with petroleum exploration
and development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR) is that it may harm wildlife. Environmentalists
instead propose an alternative form of energy [Industrial Wind] that is
guaranteed to destroy wildlife by the millions—year after
year after year. Defending such hypocrisy serves to reinforce
what Kermit the Frog said over 30 years ago:“It’s
not easy being green!”

- From "Mandating Renewable Energy: It's not easy being green" by Michael Heberling

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

New York Definition of Farming

The New York State definition of Farming ---

Farming includes the operation or management of livestock,
dairy, poultry, fish, fruit, fur-bearing animal, and vegetable
(commonly referred to as truck) farms. Farming also includes the
operation or management of plantations, ranches, ranges, and
orchards. For example, farming includes, but is not limited to, the
raising or production of the following commodities:
— field crops, including corn, wheat, oats, rye, barley, hay,
potatoes, and dry beans;
— fruits, including apples, peaches, grapes, cherries, and
berries;
— vegetables, whether raised conventionally or hydroponically,
including tomatoes, snap beans, cabbage, carrots, beets, and
onions;
— horticultural specialties, including nursery stock, ornamental
shrubs and ornamental trees, and flowers;
— livestock and livestock products, including cattle, sheep, hogs,
goats, horses, poultry, farmed deer, farmed buffalo, ostrich,
emus, fur-bearing animals, milk, and eggs;
— aquaculture products, including fish, fish products, water
plants, and shellfish (provided the aquaculture products are
grown and raised as opposed to merely being harvested or
caught);
— honey and beeswax produced from your own bees; and
— maple syrup or cider
Farming also includes:
1) the sale of wine from a licensed farm winery as provided in
Article 6 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law,
2) the commercial boarding and training of horses as defined in
section 301(13) of the Agriculture and Markets Law, and
3) the growing of Christmas trees.

Nothing about Industrial Wind Power Production whatsoever!

Wind “Farm”? It doesn’t exist.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

UPC MARS HILL: RESIDENTS SPEAK

Some UPC Residents express themselves on their EXPERIENCE living with the Mar's Hill Wind Farm in a Maine centric blog. Good luck Cohocton, you'll need it! - Formosa

"We are not just 4. We are MOST of the north and east side residents. They are loud. Really loud. I can stand the sight of them..."

"I have to say that originally we supported the windmills and enjoyed them, however, we weren't aware of the many problems our neighbors were having and we do support our neighbors more."

"I also have been told that our town manager has sold his home to the windmill company and it will be used for their offices etc......seems like a conflict of interest to me. He should not have a personal financial gain from this company....he should be asked to resign on that basis alone. And not reading the reports and applications he signed in the name of the town is also criminal!"

"Have you seen the first for sale sign? It's up."

"We are just at the right angle that the strobing doesn't last long. I'm not sure if it will change seasonally as the tilt of the earth changes, but right now it's very brief. Really threw me though the first time I experienced it as I thought there was something wrong with the lights... but the lights weren't on."

"I've felt the disorientation, but from the sound. It was much worse earlier around Christmas when they first started running them. We wear earplugs sometimes just to get a break from them now."

Sunday, April 08, 2007

YESWINDCOHOCTON.COM: More half truths

YES! blog posts an article asking "Is this the future of coal generation?" regarding the Four Sisters coal facility in Canada being demolished. What they don't tell you is that industrial wind had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with this closure. I guess the neighbors of Canada haven't read YES!'s page about which would you want in your backyard? - because OPG isn't replacing this coal plant with wind.

So, just what is Ontario Power Generation's plan to do to replace this plant's base load? Like with FPL, INDUSTRIAL WIND DOES NOT EVEN FACTOR IN THE MIX
http://www.opg.com/power
OPG is moving forward with the federal approvals process for new nuclear units at an existing site.

[From the OPG website...]http://www.opg.com/power
As one of the largest producers of electricity in North America, Ontario Power Generation operates 64 hydroelectric, 5 fossil and 3 nuclear stations producing more than 22,000 megawatts of electricity.

In fact, OPG owns one of the most diversified, low cost and low emission portfolios in North America. Our commitment is to continually improve the efficiency of our generating stations so that Ontario has the power it needs, when it needs it.

During 2006, OPG increased production from its economical and virtually emissionfree nuclear and hydroelectric stations. Accounting for 31 per cent of the energy used in Ontario in 2006, OPG’s 10 nuclear units generated 46.9 TWh - an increase of four percent over their 2005 production levels.

This increase was primarily because of the generation from the Pickering Unit 1 reactor, which completed its first full year of operation since returning to service in the fall of 2005.



OPG's 2006 Generating Mix

Hydro:
33.3 Terawatt Hours

Nuclear:
46.9 Terawatt Hours

Fossil:
25.0 Terawatt Hours


Increased nuclear production also reduced the number of times OPG's fossil fuelled plants were called upon to generate electricity for the Province - helping to reduce air emissions and moderate the price of electricity for Ontario consumers.

OPG’s 64 hydroelectric stations also produced more electricity than in 2005. Total hydro production in 2006 was 33.3 TWh compared to 32.6 TWh the year before. This increase resulted from higher water levels in Eastern and Northeast Ontario.


What did the media have to write about this event?
http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20060612/smokestacks_demolished_061206?hub=TorontoHome

"Operations at the plant were shutdown by the government last year as part of the Dalton McGuinty Liberals' promise to shut all five coal plants in the province by 2009.

The government, however, recently admitted it will not be able to reach that goal.

Ontario Power Generation plans to build another generating station of some kind when all buildings and structures of the existing facility are removed by the end of 2007."

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Global Smoking Machine

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8174226968688178689







Thursday, March 22, 2007

YESWINDCOHOCTON.COM: UNREALISTIC CHOICES

YESWINDCOHOCTON.COM offers up a page of unrealistic choices showing a coal plant (This...) and then micro/personal wind and solar panels (or This) as if that was a valid equivalent choice of either the coal plant or industrial wind turbines (the point of the page). Unfortunately, industrial wind turbines do not replace base capacity plants. Conventional power plants put out 100's of times the power that all the planned industrial wind projects in NYS combined and wind just isn't counted on as base capacity. No one in their right mind likes pollution, but no one should believe either that industrial wind that the DOE projects as providing 1/48th of 1 percent of electric generation by 2030 is a choice _instead_ of conventional power plants or that these projects will make a dent in global warming. Like using leeches back in the middle ages to cure the sick --- the answer lies elsewhere...

This misleading "choice" is like asking a Cohocton family of four, who needs daily reliable transportation rain, snow or shine to work, school, doctors, grocery store...

THIS...


OR THIS...

Crystal Ball for the Cohocton Industrial Developers/Farmers

Cohocton Crystal Ball 2008 - once the turbines are in...

the articles that we _will_ see in the Valley News once these turbines are in?

if YES is calling neighbors names now, who do you think the neighbors are going call names in 2008?

the look on Dykeman, Meyers, Towner's, Moore's or Wolcott's face when they answer their door at 2am to a disgruntled neighbor asking them to turn their 500 foot "windmill" off because it's keeping their family awake?

when all these "nice" out of town construction crews come to town and start looking for entertainment on the weekends?

what Hunt's going to say to the noise complaints?

what those strobe lights are going to look like all night every night?

how shocked people are going to be once they actually see this project going in?

how people are going to react when they try to sell their property and get far less for it?

how a neighbor is going to react when they are in their own field and experience shadow flicker from another neighbor's no-impact "windmill"?

how ticked people are going to be once they get their tax bills?

Crystal ball predicts the after project noise will drown out even the wind turbines...

Formosa

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Maple Ridge: No material capacity according to it's owners

Here is Mapleridge the largest "wind farm" in the East ... the owners Flat Rock and PPM convince the PSC that their projects have no material capacity in the NYISO market, yet loudly proclaim to everyone else that they are "fighting global warming and making a difference"???

From the PSC Petition itself ...

"Even if Iberdrola’s Jordanville facility were to commence operations as planned, and its capacity were combined with the Maple Ridge facility’s capacity, Iberdrola’s share of the NYISO market would remain de minimis. The combined capacity of those facilities would amount to only 457 MW of the approximately 38,000 MW of generation operating in the NYISO market, or less than 2% of that market, well below any threshold level for concern.6 The Joint Petitioners have also demonstrated that Iberdrola’s interests in generation facilities located in 6 Case 04-E-1364, Sithe Energies, Inc., Declaratory Ruling on Review of Stock Transfers (issued January 14, 2005).
CASE 07-E-0009
-6-
adjoining regions are de minimis in their effect on New York markets. As a result, Iberdrola’s acquisition of Scottish Power will not materially increase electric market concentration within New York, preventing Iberdrola from exercising horizontal market power.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Voices of Tughill & Meyersdale PA

The intro sound is just of recorded turbines ... about a minute in the interviews start.. the video is in three parts...


























A set of videos from Meyersdale PA ...





















Senator Jim Alesi: 18 Month ban on Industrial Wind Projects

To all concerned NYS property owners:

Please write or call NYS Senator Jim Alesi in support of the 18 month moratorium on industrial wind turbine projects in New York State. Senator Alesi needs to know you support this much needed bill.

http://www.senatoralesi.com/

Thank you Senator Alesi!

Formosa

Industrial Wind compared to a Hired Hand

This is excellent and tragically spot on.

Formosa

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

NPR: Carol Murphy ACENY.ORG New York Renewables

How misleading this NPR broadcast is... once again associating foreign OIL independence with industrial wind (renewables)! Industrial wind was not the reason Brazil achieved foreign oil independence! Brazil has hardly any industrial wind turbines at all, with 97% of electricty being created by hydro facilities.

Thirty years ago, in the mid-1970s, Brazil was 80% dependent on foreign energy. How did Brazil do it? “They did it by aggressively promoting biodiesel, by aggressively promoting ethanol and flexible fuel vehicles. That’s at the core of the strategy.

Marion Trieste: Wind Turbines lower mercury contamination

Marion Trieste, a public outreach consultant to Reunion Power, said Tuesday she was taken aback by the letters.

"While mercury contamination from coal-fired plants threatens the health of millions of children in this state, here we have someone who would sue people for allowing a 100-percent pollution-free source of energy on their properties," she said. "With what’s going on in the world these days, I find it incredible."

Another 1/2 truth. What Mrs. Trieste fails to state is that Industrial Wind projects in New York will not shut down or lower mercury contamination of existing coal plants. Existing coal plants will not be shut down or reduce operations due to industrial wind projects in New York.

Only clean coal filters (or replacement base capability) can do this, not wind turbine projects. Clean coal filters will reduce mercury output by 95%.

So we once again strongly call this wind developer's paid spokesperson's credibility into question.

Friday, March 02, 2007

Florida Power and Light: What choice did they make?

So here we have Florida Power and Light --- the owner of the largest Industrial Wind "farm" (Altamont Pass) 4,000 turbines, and what do you think they are opening this year? More wind farms right?

After all YES!WindCohocton tells all of us that the choice for us is wind or a destructive fossil fuel burning plant.... so if we "choose" more wind, then we won't get more bad power plants.

FPL, what choice did they make? Did they chose wind over coal, natural gas or nuclear?

Western Palm Beach County:
...two new, state-of-the-art, natural gas-fired combined-cycle generating units to a 220-acre site in western Palm Beach County. The new units would be clean, efficient, reliable and cost-effective new sources of power capable of serving the equivalent of 466,000 homes and businesses.

Featuring natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power plant technology.
Utilizing a site designated by the county for power plant development.
Capable of serving 466,000 homes and businesses.
Located in an industrial section of western Palm Beach County.
Providing numerous temporary construction jobs.
Offering 40 to 50 new full-time jobs.
Located near existing power transmission lines needed to move electricity from the plant to growing communities

Glades County:
...FPL must add to its power generation capacity. The company is proposing to build an advanced technology coal power plant in Glades County, Florida.

Turkey Point Unit #5:
In August 2003, FPL announced the need to add new resources to begin serving customers in 2007 and our plan to meet that need by adding a new combined-cycle generating unit to our existing Turkey Point site about 25 miles south of Miami near Florida City.

Manatee Unit #3:
That's why we're proposing to add by 2005 a new, state-of-the-art, natural gas generating unit at the same site.

Mixing Cement in the Sky

Older article - but lesson still important today: Developer told us there would be no impacts....

Enviro Group Sues Wind Farm to Stop Bird Deaths

New studies show greater-than-expected harm to humans, wildlife
Written By: James M. Taylor
Published In: Environment News
Publication Date: March 1, 2004
Publisher: The Heartland Institute


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Giant wind turbines at Altamont Pass, California, are illegally killing more than 1,000 birds of prey each year, according to a lawsuit filed January 12 by the Center for Biological Diversity. The suit demands an injunction halting operation of the turbines until and unless protective measures are taken and highlights increasing concerns regarding a power source long hailed as environmentally friendly by environmental activist groups.


Thousands of Deaths Every Year

Thousands of wind turbines were built in Northern California’s Altamont Pass region during the 1980s in response to activist groups’ call for greater reliance on renewable energy sources. Construction of the wind turbines, however, has made the region one of the most deadly places in the world for a large variety of birds. Literally thousands of birds are killed by the turbines each year, including roughly 1,000 annual kills of such valued birds of prey as golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, and burrowing owls.

Complicating matters, Altamont Pass is a major migration route for birds of prey in North America. The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act makes it illegal to kill migratory birds without permits. According to Benito Perez, special agent in charge of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Portland, Oregon, office of law enforcement, every killing of a migratory bird by the Altamont Pass wind turbines is a violation of federal law.

Moreover, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act prohibits the killing of eagles. Yet in Altamont Pass, home to the nation’s largest concentration of golden eagles, wind turbines kill hundreds of the majestic birds every year.

“Altamont has become a death zone for eagles and other magnificent and imperiled birds of prey,” said Jeff Miller, a spokesman for the Center for Biological Diversity. “Birds come into the pass to hunt and get chopped up by the blades.”


Deaths Unavoidable

Owners of the wind turbines assert they have gone to great measures to protect birds from being sliced up by the turbine blades, but the technology simply does not exist to generate wind power without sacrificing an immense number of birds each year.

“It’s so unfair to say we have not been actively trying to do anything,” said Steve Stengel, a spokesman for Florida Power & Light Company, which owns many of the turbines. “We’ve done everything from installing perch guards to painting rotor blades.”

Miller, however, was skeptical wind power generators are doing all they can to ameliorate bird deaths.

“We’re asking the judge to throw the book at them,” said Miller. “We’re not suggesting they’re going to be shut down. We are suggesting turbine owners out there need to take some measures to reduce bird kill, and that they come up with some adequate mitigation or compensation.”

Many of the Center for Biological Diversity’s recommendations for ameliorating bird deaths, such as moving the Altamont Pass turbines to different locations, would necessitate significant up-front expense and make wind power generation even less efficient than is already the case. Wind power is already significantly more expensive to produce than power from such traditional sources as oil, coal, and natural gas, even though wind power receives substantial subsidies from U.S. taxpayers.


New Studies, Renewed Concerns

A study conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that Altamont Pass bird deaths are more prevalent than previously thought. According to the January 30 Oakland Tribune, previous studies conducted by wind farm operators had underestimated Altamont Pass bird kills by 25 to 300 percent. Moreover, new technologies designed to reduce the number of bird deaths will actually have the effect of increasing turbine bird kills.

The Renewable Energy Laboratory determined that new technology that would reduce the number of turbines by increasing the size of each tower’s blades would kill more birds than the preexisting turbines. The larger turbines would increase the area of “swept” air and would have more lethal blades and components than their smaller cousins.

Similarly, the Laboratory found that replacing latticed towers with tubular ones--designed to keep birds away from turbine blades by discouraging the use of lattices for nesting and predation--would also result in a net increase in bird deaths.

The new study, summarized the Tribune, “suggests the [bird death] problem is more serious than previously thought.”

Other studies, also issued in January, showed wind turbines may be more dangerous to humans than had previously been thought.

On January 25, the London Daily Telegraph reported numerous studies show low-frequency noise emanating from wind turbines is causing a variety of ailments among area residents.

According to English physician Dr. Amanda Harry, who conducted one of the studies, “People demonstrated a range of symptoms from headaches, migraines, dizziness, palpitations, and tinnitus to sleep disturbance, stress, anxiety, and depression. These symptoms had a knock-on effect in their daily lives, causing poor concentration, irritability, and an inability to cope . It travels further than audible noise, is ground-borne and is felt through vibrations.”

Similar findings were made in an unrelated study by Dr. Bridget Osborne. She presented a paper to the Royal College of General Practitioners documenting a significant increase in depression among residents of the North Wales village of Moel Maelogan after construction of a large wind turbine.

“There is a public perception that wind power is ‘green’ and has no detrimental effect on the environment,” said Osborne. “However, these turbines make low-frequency noises that can be as damaging as high-frequency noises.”

Wales archeologist Dr. Stepen Briggs initially welcomed news that a wind farm was scheduled to be built nearby. “I’m as green as the next man and the developers assured us that the windmills would cause hardly any disturbance.” However, Briggs quickly learned one of the significant downsides of wind turbines. “Once they began operating I couldn’t work in my garden anymore. The noise was unbearable. It was as if someone was mixing cement in the sky.”
Said Mark Taplin, who also witnessed construction of a wind farm near his Wales home, “It has been a miserable, horrible experience. They are 440 metres (roughly one quarter mile) away but if I step outside and they are not generating I know immediately because I can [finally] hear the silence. They grind you down--you can’t get away from them. They make you very depressed. The chomp and swoosh of the blades creates a noise that beggars belief.”
Wind power may well be the least environmentally friendly idea ever proposed by environmentalists,” noted Iain Murray, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. “Conservationists as committed as Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) and British television personality Dr. David Bellamy have come out against proposed uses of the technology. As a result, a degree of civil war has broken out in the environmental movement.”

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Maple Ridge: Annual Impact Payments, and $100,000 property settlements!

[ed - Attention nearby neighbors to the leaseholders --- everyone keeps telling you that we are imagining everying and there will be no impacts... read on... READ CAREFULLY BELOW! YOU MAY ASK YOURSELF: IS YOUR RESIDENCE THE ONE UPC WILL NEED TO PURCHASE AFTER THE COHOCTON TURBINES GO IN? WHY HAVE THERE BEEN ANNUAL IMPACT PAYMENTS TO NEARBY NEIGHBORBS WHEN WE ARE TOLD THERE ARE NO IMPACTS?

Why didn't we hear any of this from Arleigh Rice Supervisor of Lowville during the YES! Wind Forum??

This is an excerpt from an interview from the Attorney representing the town of Lowville Tug Hill's Maple Ridge turbine project. This is provided on the NYSERDA website Wind Toolkit]

http://www.powernaturally.org/Programs/Wind/toolkit.asp (under General Information)


One Community’s Experience with Wind Development:
An Interview with Richard J. Graham, Esq.
Lewis County Attorney
Town Attorney, Town of Lowville
as told to Katherine Daniels of the
New York Planning Federation

[skipping Q1..Q16]

Q17: Did the developer offer any other inducements to the towns?
A17: In our case, we’ve had several positive experiences with the developer in what I call "good faith" issues. These are instances where the developer has agreed to extend its good faith towards the communities. For example, from the very outset, Flat Rock agreed to pay all legal fees incurred by the municipalities, not only in the review of permitting issues, but also in any of the contracting issues that arose. Flat Rock absorbed the entire cost of the special counsel hired to perform the Empire Zone work. The developer has also agreed to fund the cost of a financial advisor to assist the towns with managing the increased revenues, and has offered to construct a visitors’ center to attract tourism. Finally, the developer has agreed to make impact payments to nearby neighboring landowners. For example, the developer has agreed to make impact payments to the nearest neighbors to some of the towers totaling $25,000 per year. Flat Rock has also made $100,000 in property settlement payments, including the purchase of a residence.

Fenner: FREE - your taxdollars at work!

Here in NYS we pay 71% higher property taxes than other states and we have State Senator Valesky getting NYS taxpayers to fund a marketing stop showcase for Wind Industry Developers at Fenner. You would think the developer at Fenner (and all the developers in NY) with their millions of dollars of profit would pay for this sales office? This is unbelievable!

Senator Valesky secured a grant to support the work and efforts of Fenner Renewable Energy Education (FREE) Center in Fenner. Pictured L-R, Assemblyman Bill Magee; Joan Livingston, FREE Center; Sen. Valesky and Fenner Town Supervisor Russ Carey.

In keeping with his effort to open up the state budget process, Sen. David J. Valesky (D-Oneida) publicly released the entire list of projects his office helped secure in Fiscal Year 2006-07. In total, Sen. Valesky was able to direct legislative initiative grants to 35 projects in the 49th Senate District, totaling approximately $375,000.

"Taxpayers deserve to know where their money is going. So in keeping with my on-going efforts to improve transparency in state government, I am releasing the list of grants for local projects in the 49th Senate District recently approved by the State Senate," said Sen. Valesky. "I believe that if projects are worthy of public funds, then the public deserves to know the details."

Challenge to "JT": No noise at Fenner?

Our challenge to the outside "authority on wind turbines" who calls himself "JT" that frequently writes on the YES!Blog (the same blog that admonished those outsiders from being involved in Cohocton's business).

"JT" recently wrote on the YES!Blog (in part): "Most of these guys are condescending, full of rhetoric, and twist the truth thru omission.I'm from a lot farther away from cohcton than Wayland, near the fenner windfarm in Madison County, [ed- JT signed his name from Hamilton NY, about 20 MILES from Fenner] and I tell you again, these towers do not exhibit the problems they would have you believe. I wonder if the 'Doc' even is aware that the vanes of the windmills can be rotated, to keep a constant speed of the rotors, despite higher windspeeds- ya see, they don't keep going faster and faster the higher the wind speed... which puts an upper limit on the noise....] Do you own research. look up real-world decibel level equivalents, and spread the word.... JT atkins"

What say you "JT" to Mr. Danley of Fenner that lives 900 feet away from a turbine? Is Mr. Danley in need of psychiatric help? Are he and his wife just imagining the midnight screeches and the "train"?

What say you "JT" to the Todd's of Mars Hill?
Are they too in need of your expert help?

By LANCE GAY
Scripps Howard News Service
March 23, 2006

- The idea of windmills brings to mind bucolic Renaissance paintings of Dutch landscapes and tulip beds. But that's hardly the experience of some who have to live next to the 400-foot electricity-generating giants being built across America's breezy plains.

They complain about the incessant "whoosh-whoosh-whoosh" of the machines at work, the flashes of light and shade across their windows, and the occasional terrifying midnight screech of turbines repositioning themselves to catch shifting winds.

"It sounds like a train going through, except the train never comes through," said Wayne Danley, whose life had been turned upside down by a giant windmill located 900 feet from his house in rural Fenner, N.Y., where he has lived since 1976.

Danley said he fears the days when the winds come from the northwest. "The whoop, whoop, whoop becomes a roar," he said. And in the spring before the trees sprout leaves, the turning turbine causes flashes of light in his living room that so annoyed his wife, the pastor of a local church, that she had to flee to the bedroom to get away from it.

Danley said he has nothing against windmills or the 19 others in the neighboring windfarm. He only wishes someone would do something about relocating the one on his doorstep. "It's too close," he said.

Marion Trieste: On the payroll of Reunion Power

Did anyone at the Cohocton Wind Forum know that the vocal Mrs. Trieste was on a Wind Developers payroll since 2004? Did anyone introduce her as "Marion Trieste of Reunion Power"? Trieste parades around New York State to small towns everywhere and refutes all critical views of industrial wind power under the guise of being an independent and objective, scientific proponent.

Cohocton, you are being fooled.

http://www.reunionpower.com/reunionteam.html

Marion Trieste, Community Outreach & Public Relations518.584.7817 Ms. Trieste has been a member of Reunion's development team since 2004 and has established successful community outreach and public relations activities for Reunion's wind energy projects. Ms. Trieste is currently President of Trieste Associates, a company that specializes in forming partnerships among the various stakeholders affected by environmental decisions, and which works to find mutually beneficial, cost effective solutions that protect human health and the environment. The company's services include public and media relations, strategic planning, community event planning, and public education. Ms. Trieste has over 22 years of experience working on environmental issues including over ten years of experience as a staff member of the Sierra Club and Scenic Hudson.Ms. Trieste holds a BS in Wildlife Management from the University of Wyoming.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

John Meyer: It's my opinion

John Meyer writes us in the Vally News a long letter about his "opinion" about Industrial Wind Turbines on his land, and support for the UPC project. In reading, his general theme seems to be he's helping Cohocton stay afloat and taking issue with James Hall.

He closes with: "This is the first, and probably the last letter that I plan to write about this subject. I did not write this to open up a debate about this subject, just to express my opinions. That is what makes this country great, if you are against them, that's fine too. You are entitled to your opinion and I am not planning to sue you for them either. Have a nice day, Mr. Hall remember 7 am sharp."

Mr. Meyer, I will agree with you, you are entitled to your opinion, but you seem to have forgotten one very important part. Your "opinion" will impact me and my land and I don't really appreciate it, not one bit. You want to leave my property holding the bag and shoulder your burden while you collect that check. Yes as a neighbor, I do happen to take it personally.

But, in the interest of respecting your property rights as I would want mine respected, I'll make you a simple proposition: You keep from violating my property rights and having to shoulder your burden from your "opinion"/industrial park, and I'll object no further. I'm certain many others would feel the same way.

Your last comment on not sueing Mr. Hall on his opinion has me stumped. Neither Mr. Hall nor I are the ones proposing to put up 500 foot high, strobe lit, noisy, industrial machines on our land and bringing an industrial park to our rural neighbors. Perhaps you are confusing taking responsibility for one's actions with something else entirely? I come from the old school: a man is responsible for what he does to his neighbors.

Which all brings me to a very important question. Meyer, who do you think is responsible to shoulder your burden by your actions (which by the way benefit you)? Me? Mr. Hall? Your other neighbors? From your letter, you seem perfectly content in shifting responsibility of your actions to me and my property so you can collect that check.

Finally, if you think you Cohocton farmers are the only ones that are up and at work at 7am - you've sorely mistaken. As a group: very disappointing.

Signed,
Your neighbor (who sees your wind measuring equipment quite plainly)
Jim Lince
9955 Wagner Gully Road
Cohocton, NY